2007年2月3日星期六
[+/-] |
用GTalk聊天/Talk with all your friends in GTalk! |
GTalk To Me.
From Jan,17th,06',GTalk began to support federating with any servers which support Dialback service of Jabber servers.For you,bloggers,especially Chinese bloggers,that's really a lollopalooza to us:you can add your buddies in MSN,Yahoo!,ICQ and QQ!The resault is that you can only log in GTalk,then talk with friends on all the IMs(Instant Messengers) above!
Here're the steps:
1)Download software Psi,url:http://psi.affinix.com/download;
2)Set your GTalk account as the definied account,then get yours online;
3)Seek Jabber server in "Service Discovery" in system content at left-bottom corner.
4)Input the address of Jabber server(Eg.jabbernet.dk) into "Address",then click"Browse,it will list out the Jabber servers' address;
5)Log in your IM account,and plz be sure they are correct(may be Chinglish here);
6)Then you can see your lovely friends in Psi;
7)Close Psi and log in your Gtalk,you will find them appeared in your GTalk!-Wow!You succeed!
中文详解:
2006年1月17日,Google支持服务器互相通讯,可与任何支援dialback协议的Jabber服务器“结盟”(federate,此术语即服务器互通之意)。
--维基百科
Gtalk(Google Talk)的界面给人一种简洁,清爽的感觉,而且最新测试版本增加了文件传输,语音留言等功,显示音乐状态等新功能,这样我不得不爱上Gtalk了。更绝的是gtalk使用的是开源的jabber通信协议,而不象msn,yahoo,icq等使用的自我的封闭和通讯协议,这就使得我们不光可以在其实jabber客户端上登陆使用gtalk,而且可以利用这一点将msn,yahoo,icq全部整全到gtalk里面,从此以后你就不用同时在电脑上开N多IM,而只用开gtalk就全部搞定!
先简单谈一下原理,两个jabber客户端通讯的路线是Jabber Client-Jabber Server1-Jabber Server2-Jabber Client,jabber客户端和其实IM如MSN,YAHOO,ICQ的通讯原理为Jabber Client-Jabber Server1-Jabber Server2-Other IM Client(eg,MSN,YAHOO,ICQ),如果你用gtalk和msn通讯,则整修过程是,gtalk将你的消息传送到jabber server1(gmail.com),gmail.com再将消息转发到网络上一些为msn搭建的jabber sever2,jabber sever2再将消息转发到目标msn,整个过程结束。
下面介绍怎样利用jabber客户端Psi将你的msn,yahoo,aim/icq,qq好整合到Gtalk中,此设置过程要用到Psi,之后就不用开Psi了,只需开gtalk就能和msn好友聊了。
首选当然是安装好Psi,最新版本的Psi下地址为 http://psi.affinix.com/download
安装完成后,点这里参照google talk官方帮助文件里的设置(已经够详细了)将你的gtalk帐号设置成缺省登陆帐号,然后登陆你的帐号状态为"online".
点击Psi左下角的系统菜单中的"Service Discovery"寻找jabber服务器,在所弹出窗口的"Address"栏填上jabber服务器地址如jabbernet.dk,后面的"Node"可以不用选,然后点"Browse",下面就会显示支持的IM的jabber服务器地址。
jabber服务器参考地址: jabbernet.dk
jaim.at
bgmn.net
freelinq.com
jabber官方网站有公布更多的服务器地址,大家可以尝试http://www.xmpp.net/bycountry.shtml
以msn为例,在msn上点右键然后先"Register",在弹出的对话框中填上你相应的信息即你的msn帐号和密码,如果登陆成功的话会有"successful"的提示,
同时你的Psi好友名单下面的"Agents/Transports"会有显示此msn的jabber服务器地址,而且图标为亮,表示登陆正常。你的msn好友也会显示在你的Psi好友栏里面,而且可以看到其ID的后面会跟一串类似"@msn.jabbernet.dk"的东西,其实这个就是jabber服务器地址啦。
好,现在可以退出Psi,登陆你的Gtalk,会收到一个有人想加你为好友的消息,点"show requests",接下来全部点"yes",这样你的msn好友就全部添加到人的Gtalk上了,现在你就可以直接和你的msn好友聊天啦!(历史性的一刻)
用同样的方法可以将yahoo messenger,icq/aim,qq的好友全部添加到Gtalk中。特别一点的是QQ,它的jabber服务器是freelinq.com 由北京一网络公司开发,鉴于腾讯公司严历打击QQ第三方的连接插件,功能没敢做得太全,你加上去后不会在Gtalk中显示你的QQ好友,但当你QQ好友给你发信息的时候你会收复到,而且能够回复(可以利用这个挂QQ,但我个人不支持)。
还有点小经验要和大家分享,当我们将msn,yahoo,icq,aim加上去后,gtalk上的好友可能会太多而不好区分哪些是msn好友,哪些是yahoo好友,好在gtalk有强在的搜索功能,在搜索框中输入"msn."(不包括引号)就会显示所有msn好友,同样输入"yahoo."会显示所有yahoo好友。(这个功能可是不小心发现的咧)
在搜索框中输入"%"(不包括引号)也会显示所有msn好友列表,这跟输入"msn."的效果一样,但对于yahoo,icq/aim,qq就没有发现其它更简单的方法了。
附上
Gtalk最新测试版下载地址:http://dl.google.com/googletalk/googletalk-setup-testing.exe
Gtalk官方blog: http://www.pkblogs.com/googletalk
from
Connect Google Talk to AIM, MSN, & Yahoo Posted by Jeff
BaiduJabber
[+/-] |
全球变暖很可能是人为的/Global warming 'very likely' man-made |
PARIS — The world's leading climate scientists said global warming has begun, is "very likely" caused by man, and will be unstoppable for centuries, according to a report obtained Friday by The Associated Press. The scientists — using their strongest language yet on the issue — said now that the world has begun to warm, hotter temperatures and rises in sea level "would continue for centuries," no matter how much humans control their pollution. The report also linked the warming to the recent increase in stronger hurricanes. "The observed widespread warming of the atmosphere and ocean, together with ice-mass loss, support the conclusion that it is extremely unlikely that global climate change of the past 50 years can be explained without external forcing, and very likely that is not due to known natural causes alone," said the report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change — a group of hundreds of scientists and representatives of 113 governments. The phrase "very likely" translates to a more than 90 percent certainty that global warming is caused by man's burning of fossil fuels. That was the strongest conclusion to date, making it nearly impossible to say natural forces are to blame. What that means in simple language is "we have this nailed," said top U.S. climate scientist Jerry Mahlman, who originated the percentage system. Sharon Hays, associate director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy at the White House, welcomed the strong language of the report. "It's a significant report. It will be valuable to policy makers," she told The Associated Press in an interview in Paris, where hundreds of scientists and government officials were meeting to discuss global warming. Hays stopped short of saying whether or how the report could bring about change in President Bush's policy about greenhouse gas emissions. The 20-page summary of the panel's findings, due to be officially released later in the day, represents the most authoritative science on global warming. The new language marked an escalation from the panel's last report in 2001, which said warming was "likely" caused by human activity. There had been speculation that the participants might try to say it is "virtually certain" man causes global warming, which translates to 99 percent certainty. The panel predicted temperature rises of 2-11.5 degrees Fahrenheit by the year 2100. That was a wider range than in the 2001 report. However, the panel also said its best estimate was for temperature rises of 3.2-7.1 degrees Fahrenheit. In 2001, all the panel gave was a range of 2.5-10.4 degrees Fahrenheit. On sea levels, the report projects rises of 7-23 inches by the end of the century. An additional 3.9-7.8 inches are possible if recent, surprising melting of polar ice sheets continues. But there is some cold comfort. Some, but not all, of the projected temperature and sea level rises are slightly lower than projected in a previous report in 2001. That is mostly due to use of more likely scenarios and would still result in dramatic effects across the globe, scientists said. Many scientists had warned that this estimate was too cautious and said sea level rise could be closer to 3-5 feet because of ice sheet melt. Nevertheless, scientists agreed the report is strong. "There's no question that the powerful language is intimately linked to the more powerful science," said one of the study's many co-authors, Andrew Weaver of the University of Victoria, who spoke by phone from Canada. He said the report was based on science that is rock-solid, peer-reviewed, and consensus. "It's very conservative. Scientists by their nature are skeptics." The scientists wrote the report based on years of peer-reviewed research and government officials edited it with an eye toward the required unanimous approval by world governments. In the end, there was little debate on the strength of the wording about the role of man in global warming. The panel quickly agreed Thursday on two of the most contentious issues: attributing global warming to man-made burning of fossil fuels and connecting it to a recent increase in stronger hurricanes. Negotiations over a third and more difficult issue — how much the sea level is predicted to rise by 2100 — went into the night Thursday with a deadline approaching for the report. While critics call the panel overly alarmist, it is by nature relatively cautious because it relies on hundreds of scientists, including skeptics. "I hope that policymakers will be quite convinced by this message," said Riibeta Abeta, a delegate whose island nation Kiribati is threatened by rising seas. "The purpose is to get them moving." The Chinese delegation was resistant to strong wording on global warming, said Barbados delegate Leonard Fields and others. China has increasingly turned to fossil fuels for its huge and growing energy needs. The U.S. government delegation was not one of the more vocal groups in the debate over whether warming is man-made, said officials from other countries. And several attendees credited the head of the panel session, Susan Solomon, a top U.S. government climate scientist, with pushing through the agreement so quickly. The Bush administration acknowledges that global warming is man-made and a problem that must be dealt with, Bush science adviser John Marburger has said. However, Bush continues to reject mandatory limits on so-called "greenhouse" gases. But this is more than just a U.S. issue. "What you're trying to do is get the whole planet under the proverbial tent in how to deal with this, not just the rich countries," Mahlman said Thursday. "I think we're in a different kind of game now." The panel, created by the United Nations in 1988, releases its assessments every five or six years — although scientists have been observing aspects of climate change since as far back as the 1960s. The reports are released in phases — this is the first of four this year. The next report is due in April and will discuss the effects of global warming. But that issue was touched upon in the current document. The report says that global warming has made stronger hurricanes, including those on the Atlantic Ocean, such as Hurricane Katrina. The report said that an increase in hurricane and tropical cyclone strength since 1970 "more likely than not" can be attributed to man-made global warming. The scientists said global warming's connection varies with storms in different parts of the world, but that the storms that strike the Americas are global warming-influenced. That's a contrast from the 2001 which said there was not enough evidence to make such a conclusion. And it conflicts with a November 2006 statement by the World Meteorological Organization, which helped found the IPCC. The meteorological group said it could not link past stronger storms to global warming. Fields — of Barbados, a country in the path of many hurricanes — said the new wording was "very important." He noted that insurance companies — which look to science to calculate storm risk — "watch the language, too."
Associated Press Writer Angela Charlton contributed to this report.
By AP/SETH BORENSTEIN from TIME